EVENT ENDED

Supreme Court rules in favor of Trump ahead of Super Tuesday, reversing Colorado ballot decision: Highlights

The decision was unanimous.

SHARE THIS —

The latest news on Supreme Court decisions:

  • The Supreme Court has ruled in former President Donald Trump’s favor, saying Colorado erred when he was removed from the ballot.
  • Colorado holds primary votes tomorrow, but Trump's name remained on the ballot while the case was being litigated.
1 years ago / 2:01 PM EST

Supreme Court more divided than it appears

Today's Supreme Court ruling was described by the court as being unanimous on the underlying question of whether states could kick Trump off the ballot, but online sleuthing suggests the nine justices were more divided than they wanted to let on.

The published ruling says that the separate opinions written by the three liberal justices and conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett were "concurrences" in the court's parlance, meaning they generally agreed with the majority.

But as Mark Joseph Stern of Slate discovered, it seems that the concurring opinion was originally styled as a partial dissent:

1 years ago / 1:58 PM EST

Biden campaign manager responds to decision

Today at MSNBC’s inaugural live event series, MSNBC Live, Biden 2024 Principal Deputy Campaign Manager Quentin Fulks told MSNBC host Jen Psaki that the decision mattered little to the campaign.

"We don’t really care," Fulks said. "It’s not been the way we’ve been planning to beat Donald Trump. Our focus since day one of launching this campaign has been to defeat Donald Trump at the ballot box. And everything we’ve done since the president announced back in April that he’s running for re-election is to build an infrastructure and apparatus to do so."

1 years ago / 1:44 PM EST

Maine secretary of state withdraws ruling that Trump is ineligible for 2024 primary ballot

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows has withdrawn her previous ruling that Trump is ineligible for the state’s 2024 primary ballot, citing the Supreme Court’s Colorado decision that also applies to ballots in all states.

“I have reviewed the Anderson decision carefully. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individual states lack authority to enforce Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to federal offices,” Bellows said in a statement. “Consistent with my oath and obligation to follow the law and the Constitution, and pursuant to the Anderson decision, I hereby withdraw my determination that Mr. Trump’s primary petition is invalid.”

In December, Bellows had ruled that Trump is constitutionally barred from appearing on Maine’s primary ballot over his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Trump in January filed an appeal of the ruling by Maine’s top election official.

1 years ago / 1:11 PM EST

Trump applauds ruling: 'You cannot take somebody out of a race'

Trump took a victory lap from his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, this afternoon.

"It will go a long way toward bringing our country together," Trump said of the decision. "You cannot take somebody out of a race because the opponent would like to have it that way."

1 years ago / 12:49 PM EST

Trump has rattled off his criticism of criminal cases

Ginger GibsonSenior Washington Editor

In remarks that are supposed to be responding to the Supreme Court decision, Trump is mainly criticizing the four pending criminal cases. And he is now talking about immigration policy.

1 years ago / 12:41 PM EST

Trump praises Supreme Court after decision

Ginger GibsonSenior Washington Editor

Trump is addressing the decision, saying it was a good decision by the court.

"The voters can take someone out of the race very quickly, but a court shouldn’t be doing that and the Supreme Court said that very well," he said.

1 years ago / 12:13 PM EST

Lawyers for plaintiffs express disappointment, but say justices didn't rule on whether Trump engaged in insurrection

The lawyers who were involved in representing the plaintiffs in the Colorado case expressed disappointment today with the Supreme Court’s decision, but suggested that the justices still left open the possibility that Trump engaged in an insurrection. 

“I think that what is in many ways most striking about this opinion is that the Supreme Court was given the opportunity to exonerate Donald Trump for engaging in insurrection. Donald Trump asked them to exonerate him for engaging in insurrection and they did not do that,” Noah Bookbinder, president of CREW, said during a virtual press conference. “There is not a single sentence from a single justice in that opinion that came out today, taking substantive issue with the findings of the Colorado Supreme Court that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection.”

1 years ago / 12:12 PM EST

Trump remarks now scheduled for 12:30 p.m.

Trump's remarks are now scheduled for 12:30 p.m.

1 years ago / 11:30 AM EST

Trump lawyer praises court decision

Trump attorney Alina Habba praised the court's decision.

"I’ve said it before — lawfare will not stand, due process will not be denied and We The People will make our choice at the ballot box," she wrote on X.

1 years ago / 10:43 AM EST

Supreme Court ruling does not extend to state officials

The high court's ruling on the 14th Amendment does not apply to state-level officials, which is potentially bad news for the "Cowboys for Trump" co-founder who was removed from his post as a county commissioner in New Mexico.

A judge in the state ordered Couy Griffin removed in 2022 and banned him from seeking further public office under the terms of the 14th Amendment after he was convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds Jan. 6.

Griffin has appealed the decision to the Supreme Court and told NBC News last month that he was hopeful a ruling in Trump's favor could help his case. The ruling, however, makes it clear it does not apply to lower-level officials.

“This case raises the question whether the States, in addition to Congress, may also enforce Section 3. We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the ruling said.