Senator criticizes Hegseth for not meeting with Democrats ahead of hearing
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., began her questioning of Hegseth by saying that she tried to meet with him before the confirmation hearing but that he did not ever respond to her request.
"I've been on this committee since 2011 and during that time, I voted to confirm six nominees to be secretary of defense from three administrations," Shaheen said, adding that included two Democratic and one Republican administration.
"Every one of those nominees met with me and my Democratic colleagues on this committee before the hearing. So as you can imagine, I was disappointed when no one ever followed up," the senator told Hegseth.
Shaheen asked Hegseth if he understood that if confirmed as defense secretary, he would have "a responsibility to meet with all members of this committee, not just Republicans?"
Hegseth responded that he looked forward to working with Shaheen and her colleagues, saying: "National defense is not partisan. It should not be about Republicans or Democrats."
Reed grills Hegseth on stance on reporting war crimes
Reed pressed Hegseth on reporting war crimes and his role in pushing for Trump to pardon or promote men accused or convicted of war crimes.
“As someone who’s led men in combat directly and had to make very difficult decisions, I thought very deeply about the balance between legality and lethality, ensuring that the men and women on the front lines have the opportunity to destroy with and close the enemy and that lawyers aren’t the ones getting in the way,” Hegseth said.
He added that he was not discussing the Uniform Code of Military Justice or Geneva Conventions, but rather “restrictive rules of engagement” that have “made it more difficult to defeat our enemies.” Hegseth claimed that there was evidence withheld and prosecutorial misconduct in the cases Reed referred to.
Reed finished his questioning by asking Hegseth what a “jagoff” is, which Hegseth defined as an officer within the Judge Advocate General’s Corps “who puts his or her own priorities in front of the war fighters.” Jagoff is a derisive term meaning a stupid person.
Reed, Hegseth spar over email reports, DEI efforts
In a tense exchange, Reed asked Hegseth if he was “aware” of reports that current serving military personnel had received emails “threatening them with being fired for supporting the current Department of Defense policies.”
Reed stated that one such email to a military officer that he’d been made aware of read, “with the incoming administration looking to remove disloyal, corrupt, traitorous, liberal officers such as yourself, we will certainly be putting your name into the list of those personnel to be removed.”
Hegseth said, “certainly I’m not aware of that — it’s not one of my efforts” before diving into his focus on “accountability.”
The exchange quickly resulted in brief sparring with Reed, with Hegseth criticizing the “DEI policies of today,” which he said “are not the same as what happened back then."
"They’re dividing troops inside formations, causing commanders to walk on eggshells, not putting meritocracy first,” Hegseth said.
Reed fired back, telling Hegseth that “all of your public comments don’t talk about meritocracy — they talk about liberal democratic efforts that are destroying the military, that those people are enemies.”
Hegseth prepared for tough questions from Democrats
As Democrats begin their questioning of Hegseth, he's almost certain to hear lines of inquiry that have come up in his prep sessions. A source familiar says Hegseth has run “murder boards,” including as recently as last week, to get ready for today’s high-profile hearing.
FBI investigation into Hegseth was 'insufficient' for a nominee with 'very complicated personal issues,' Reed said
Reed said he believes the FBI’s background investigation into Hegseth was insufficient for a nominee with “very complicated personal issues.” Reed and Wicker were the only two panel members to be granted access to the FBI report, which they received late last Friday.
“You and I have both seen the FBI background investigation of Mr. Hegseth, and I want to say for the record I believe the investigation was insufficient, frankly,” Reed said. The FBI report did not include interviews with Hegseth’s ex-wife, or with the woman who accused him of sexual assault in 2017, according to sources familiar with the content of the report.
Reed also argued the report should have been made available to all members of the committee, noting the idea had bipartisan support during discussions. Asking Wicker to allow the other members to read the report before he began his questioning, Reed said the committee would have been following precedent.
Wicker disagreed, pointing to the past two confirmation hearings of current Defense Secretary Loyd Austin and James Mattis in which only the panel’s chairman and the ranking member had access to FBI background investigation. Citing “much discussion,” Wicker stood staunchly behind his decision to keep the report from being widely distributed to the panel.
Chair and top Democrat spar about questioning
Reed requested that there be a second round of questions presented to Hegseth before the hearing finishes.
"Many of my members would like a second round," Reed said after Wicker finished his first set of questions, adding that in his recollection, the committee had "never den[ied] anyone the opportunity to ask a second round of questions."
Wicker pushed back, telling Reed that he believed there would be "adequate time" for questioning.
"We're following the same exact precedent on all things that we did with Secretary Austin, so I respectfully understand what you're saying, but I think we have an agreement," Wicker said. "It's been known for quite some time, and I intend to stick with that agreement, which we made last December."
Hegseth says accusations against him were part of a 'smear campaign'
Wicker focused his first question on accusations against Hegseth, which he said came from "anonymous sources in liberal media." Hegseth said that there was a "coordinated smear campaign orchestrated in the media against us."
"What we knew is that it wasn't about me. Most of it was about President Donald Trump, who's had to endure the very same thing for much longer amounts of time," Hegseth said.
He continued, "From story after story in the media, left-wing media, we saw anonymous source after anonymous source based on second- or third-hand accounts."
Hegseth said that a handful of anonymous sources "were allowed to drive a smear campaign and agenda about me, because our left-wing media in America today, sadly, doesn't care about the truth."
"All they were out to do, Mr. Chairman, was to destroy me. And why do they want to destroy me? Because I'm a change agent and a threat to them, because Donald Trump was willing to choose me, to empower me, to bring the Defense Department back to what it really should be, which is war-fighting."
Hegseth sticks to prepared opening statement
Hegseth’s opening remarks were interrupted three times by protesters but he followed his prepared opening statement almost exactly as it was written, emphasizing that "my only special interest is the warfighter."
Hegseth's opening statement interrupted by protesters
Hegseth's opening statement was interrupted by three protesters, all of whom were escorted from the room.
The first protester could be heard calling Hegseth a "Christian zionist."
After the man, who was taken by officers and physically removed from the room, a woman in the audience began yelling moments later about “bombing babies in Gaza."
She was picked up by an officer and carried out of the room. A third man began yelling just a minute later, having to be picked up by four officers and carried out of the room.
Hegseth paused each time a protestor began yelling, pursing his lips and waiting for the noise to subside.
After the second protestor began yelling, Wicker addressed the room, saying that Capitol Police would remove any individuals who disrupted the hearing.
"I see a pattern attempted to be inflicted on the committee, and we're simply not going to tolerate that," Wicker said.
Incoming Trump national security adviser introduces and endorses Hegseth for defense secretary
Trump's incoming White House national security adviser Mike Waltz, still serving in the House, introduced and endorsed Hegseth for defense secretary.
"Like Pete, I served in the U.S. Army. Like Pete, I'm a veteran," Waltz said. "We deployed to Afghanistan and all over the world at the height of the war on terror, which is the war of our generation, and like thousands of other war fighters, we have witnessed the hardships of war. We have experienced the loss of friends in combat. We have endured too much time away from family and friends."
Waltz said that Hegseth can "reinvigorate" warrior ethos and said he's "a man that will lead. I can't imagine having a more capable partner in my position as national security adviser."
Waltz and former Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., who also introduced Hegseth, claimed that military recruitment is down, but it actually rose sharply last year.