What to know about Rudy Giuliani's defamation trial
- Today is the third day of Rudy Giuliani's civil defamation trial related to false claims he made about two former Georgia election workers.
- A judge ruled this year that Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, defamed Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea âShayeâ Moss, by baselessly accusing them of election fraud. A jury will now decide how much Giuliani must pay Freeman and Moss for the damage he caused to their lives.
- Witness Ashlee Humphreys, a Northwestern professor and expert in social media, testified this morning that Giuliani's claims had significantly harmed Freeman and Moss' reputations. Humphreys said, based on her analysis, it would cost them $17.8 million to $47.8 million to fix the damage.
- Joseph Sibley, Giuliani's lawyer, repeatedly tried to cast doubt on Humphreys' credibility during cross-examination.
- Giuliani is expected to take the stand on Thursday.
Court adjourned; Giuliani expected to take the stand tomorrow
After Freeman's emotional testimony, Giulianiâs lawyer declined to cross-examine her. The plaintiffs have now rested their case, and court has been adjourned for the day.
The jury has been instructed to report tomorrow at 10 a.m. to give the parties time to discuss legal issues before the defense puts on their case.
Giuliani is expected to take the stand tomorrow as the only defense witness.
Freeman testifies the FBI told her she couldn't go home due to threats
Freeman testified that because of ongoing threats to her safety, the FBI told her she couldn't return to her home until after the presidential inauguration in 2021.
The FBI's orders meant that Freeman was away from her home for two months, leading her to stay at a friend's house and then multiple AirBnbs. Freeman testified that it cost her over $6,000 to cover the costs of alternate housing during that time.
She added that she had to get security cameras installed at her house, something she never considered until then. Afterward, however, she had to move once her address had been circulated online.
âI was scared to come home at dark, you know,â Freeman said, visibly emotional. âI was just scared, I knew I had to move.â
Freeman said she's spent $4,635 installing and maintaining security systems at her former and current residence. Additionally, she took out $129,932 in equity from her home on Memorial Lane in October 2022.
âItâs so scary everytime I go somewhere if I have to use my name,â Freeman said.
Freeman says she was 'terrorized' by threatening messages after Giuliani's allegations
Ruby Freeman said in her testimony this afternoon she she received threatening messages following Giuliani's allegations against her in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election.
Freeman testified that she âfelt horrible," adding that she "was scared."
Her lawyer showed the jury multiple threatening and hateful messages that Freeman had received by email after Giuliani made his defamatory allegations â including one that claimed to be from âGrand Wizardâ using the email address [email protected].
âWe are coming for you and your family! Ms. Ruby, safest place for you right now is in prison. Or you will swing from the trees,â one message read.Â
âRuby Freeman, hope the Federal Government hangs you and your daughter from the Capitol dome you treasonous piece of shit! I pray that I will be sitting close enough to hear your necks snap!â another said.Â
Freeman â who was seen wearing a shirt advertising her clothing boutique in the ballot counting videos that Giuliani had shared on social media â said she also received threatening messages through Instagram, Facebook, text message, voicemail and letters in the mail.
Freeman testified that she went to the police to report these threats, and during her meeting with officers, her phone was ringing nonstop.
Freeman takes the stand
Humphreys concluded her testimony around 3:20 p.m.
Ruby Freeman, co-plaintiff and mother of Wandrea "Shaye" Moss, has been sworn in and is now on the stand.
Giulianiâs lawyer: âTodayâs misinformation might be tomorrowâs truthâ
Sibley led a cross-examination of Humphreys this afternoon, seeking to undermine her testimony that Giuliani had significantly damaged the plaintiffs' reputations.
âYou know that todayâs misinformation might be tomorrowâs truth?â Sibley asked Humphreys. Giuliani's lawyer then cited the origin of the Covid virus and Hunter Biden as examples. But his remarks confused some in the room, including the judge.
The plaintiffsâ lawyer objected. Judge Howell sustained, saying: âIâm going to sustain the objection because I donât know where youâre going with that.â
Sibley repeatedly tried to cast doubt on Humphreys' credibility. He accused the social media expert of having looked over at the plaintiffsâ lawyers multiple times before answering his questions.
âDo you have any money riding on this? Are you getting paid something if the outcome is different?â Sibley asked at one point during Humphreys' cross-examination.
It could cost Freeman and Moss nearly $48 million to repair their reputations, expert estimates
As she wrapped up her direct testimony around 12:20 pm E.T., expert witness Ashlee Humphreys, a professor at Northwestern University and an expert on social media, said her analysis found that it would cost Freeman and Moss $17.8 million to $47.8 million to repair their reputation.
The plaintiffs' lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, led the questioning of Humphreys, in which she walked the jury through her report on the amount of damages Freeman and Moss should be granted based on the impact of Giuliani's defamatory statements.
The numbers reflect Humphreys' calculation that defamatory statements and statements that caused emotional harm to the plaintiffs earned hundreds of millions of impressions across social media, news websites and television.
Humphreys recommended that the plaintiffs receive an amount of damages on the higher end of that range, citing the amount of impressions and the reputational damage done to Freeman and Moss.
The social media expert will return to the stand for cross examination by Giuliani's lawyer after a lunch break. The court is set to return to session at 1:20 pm E.T.
'Insane': Giuliani may have defamed Georgia election workers again
Rudy Giuliani may have defamed two Georgia election workers again after the trial on Monday. The court already found him liable for defamation, and heâs on trial now for damages.
Giuliani spoke to reports in Washington D.C. Monday, claiming that everything he said about about the Georgia election workers in 2020 was true. He also said that he doesnât regret making the defamatory comments, since what he said was âthe truth.â
Joy Reid pointed out during her MSNBC show Tuesday that these statements directly contradict what his lawyer had described in court.
Trial pauses for a 10-minute break
The court proceedings have paused for a 10-minute break.
Humphreys will remain on the stand when the court returns to session, continuing to testify about the reach of Giuliani's claims about Freeman and Moss, particularly on social media.
Notably, Humphreys also did the assessment of damages for and testified in the E. Jean Carroll v. Donald Trump case.
Judge calls out Giuliani for publicly criticizing the plaintiffs after yesterday's proceedings
The plaintiffs' lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, asked the judge this morning to reprimand Giuliani again for remarks he made publicly last night.
After yesterdayâs trial proceedings, Giuliani referred to the case as a âpolitical hit jobâ in comments to reporters outside the courtroom. Later that evening, Giuliani disparaged the plaintiffs in a livestream shared to the social media platform X.
Judge Howell turned to Giuliani's lawyer, Joseph Sibley, to ask what he planned to do to curb Giuliani from speaking out again: "I know we said before you have a difficult job." Sibley responded that he would just reiterate again the repercussions to his client.
The judge also asked Giuliani directly about the comments he made last night, to which Giuliani said he didn't know he wasn't able to make them.
Giuliani said if what he said was not allowed, then it was an accident. âThereâs a lot of accidents going on,â Howell replied.Â
Freeman will take the stand later, lawyer says
In the first 30 minutes of the trial this morning, Judge Beryl Howell went over how they would ask the jury to determine how âreasonably foreseeableâ it would have been for Giulianiâs false claims against Freeman and Moss to be republished and circulated.
Howell said they could all confer on the wording of that to the jury, or else they would just need to trust her to come up with the wording. The plaintiffsâ lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, said theyâd confer with Giulianiâs lawyer, Joseph Sibley.
Gottlieb also indicated that Freeman would take the stand later, after the Atlanta poll observer and Humphreys.
Giuliani continued attacks on Moss and Freeman after Day 2 of trial
Giuliani attacked Moss and Freeman in a video broadcast live on social media Tuesday night after the conclusion of the second day of the trial.
"Theyâre seeking $40 million. Oh, yeah. Theyâre seeking $40 million for the damage that I allegedly did to them. One of them did testify that she has no money. They do have an endless number of lawyers in the courtroom, however, for people that donât have any money," Giuliani said in the video stream shared to his X account.
Giuliani continued to list off how many lawyers the plaintiffs had at their table in the courtroom, adding that the opposition's team had entered a large amount of discovery. "That's a lot of lawyers to be paying," he said. Â
Social media expert takes the stand
The jury began the third day of the trial by watching video of the deposition of a poll observer who was in State Farm Arena on election night.
Expert witness Ashlee Humphreys, a professor at Northwestern University and an expert on social media, has taken the stand. She will testify about the amount of damages she believes Freeman and Moss should receive from Giuliani.
Giuliani arrives at the courthouse
Giuliani arrived at the courthouse at 8:38 a.m.
The trial resumes at 9 a.m., with another deposition video from a poll observer present at State Farm Arena on election night.Â
An expert witness will also testify. It is possible Giuliani could be on the stand as early as this afternoon.Â
In video shown to jury, investigators said they found no evidence of fraud
Mossâ testimony yesterday came after jurors watched recorded deposition videos of investigators Frank Brown and Frances Watson, who looked into election fraud claims for the Georgia secretary of state. Brown and Watson testified that they did not find evidence to support allegations of fraud.
Brown said his investigation found no evidence of Freeman having counted ballots multiple times or scanned fraudulent ballots. He noted that sometimes ballot-counting machines jam or fail to scan, requiring the operator to scan a ballot multiple times before it is counted, and that if anyone had actually counted ballots multiple times that would have shown up on recounts.
Watsonâs testimony largely mirrored Brownâs. She confirmed that observers were never kicked out of State Farm Arena in Atlanta, where the vote counting was taking place, and that fraudulent ballots werenât brought in packed in suitcases and hidden under tables.
Election worker suing Giuliani testifies in defamation trial against him
A former Georgia election worker testified yesterday in the trial to determine how much Giuliani will have to pay her and her mother after he was found liable for defaming them with baseless claims that they committed fraud in the 2020 election.
In her first two hours of testimony, Moss took the stand as the fourth plaintiffsâ witness in the case, detailing the negative toll the false allegations have taken on her day-to-day life. She and Freeman sued Giuliani over the bogus claims, which they say turned their lives upside down.
âI now am very anxious,â Moss testified. âI have these nonstop anxious sweats. I have a lot of dark moments. I no longer go out. I will not be caught out anywhere alone, ever.â
âI look totally different, I gained like 70 pounds. I stress eat, I cry a lot,â she added. âIâm just this whole new stressed-out person.â
Here's what's happened in the case so far
Freeman and Moss sued Giuliani over false claims he made in the wake of the 2020 election, when he said they were passing around USB drives âlike they were vials of heroin or cocaineâ while working the polls at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta. A federal judge ruled this year that Giuliani had defamed the two women and was liable for damages, to be determined during the civil trial. Freeman and Moss are seeking as much as $43 million in damages.
The trial got underway this week. On Monday, Michael Gottlieb, an attorney for the women, said their names had wrongly become synonyms for crime and fraud for many Americans who heard and believed Giuliani's false claims and that the women received racist and hateful comments in the wake of Giuliani's claims.
An attorney for Giuliani, Joseph Sibley, countered that Giuliani had not promoted racism or violence and that the damages sought by the plaintiffs would be the âcivil equivalent of the death penaltyâ for his client. Giuliani has denied wrongdoing, calling the case a "political hit job" in comments to reporters outside of court yesterday.
In delivering her testimony yesterday, Moss described to jurors how her life has changed in the aftermath of the election, saying she suffers "nonstop anxious sweats" and "a lot of dark moments."
Who are the two plaintiffs?
Moss and Freeman sued Giuliani for defamation over false claims that that they committed fraud while serving as poll workers at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta during the 2020 presidential election.
Both women were cleared of any wrongdoing following a lengthy probe by Georgiaâs State Election Board that concluded this year.
In their lawsuit, they said Giuliani's claims have tarnished their lives. They're seeking as much as $43 million in damages.
During yesterday's trial, an attorney for the women argued that they received an âoverwhelmingâ amount of âvile, racist, hateful commentsâ that were âfueledâ by Giuliani and his co-conspirators.